Tooling without memory
Pass/fail suites rarely keep the ideal response trajectory.
Voice AI testing
Platforms help you run tests. We turn real call and conversation failures into approved experiences your voice agent can retrieve on the next similar turn.
You can simulate calls all day. Without a human-approved correction library, every review cycle starts from zero.
Pass/fail suites rarely keep the ideal response trajectory.
Raw logs show what happened, not what should have happened.
One-off prompt edits break other intents in live traffic.
QA findings never enter the agent as scoped few-shot examples.
We reconstruct voice or conversational traces, capture reviewer corrections, and test retrieval impact on repeated failure modes.
Turns, tools, handoffs, and final utterances from your stack exports.
Approved rewrites with policy scope, version, and critique.
Compare containment, escalation, edit time, and task completion.
A text-only benchmark cannot expose every call failure. Voice evaluation should include the mechanics of a conversation as well as the final answer.
Test barge-in, silence handling, confirmations, and whether the agent recovers after an interrupted tool call.
Review transcription uncertainty, pronunciation-sensitive entities, response delay, and how latency affects containment.
Define safe escalation triggers, required disclosures, and an approved handoff trajectory for high-risk or unresolved calls.
Store approved call corrections in a golden dataset for AI agentsUse LLM evaluation services to set release gates and compare call outcomes
Sample real calls/traces and define a voice-specific success rubric.
Corrected utterances/trajectories + retrieval prototype for one intent cluster.
Before/after comparison and a safe rollout plan.
Approval gates and metadata filters matter more when utterances hit real customers. We evaluate before broad retrieval rollout.
Send a sample of calls or conversation exports. We will identify repeated failure modes and one sprint test.